To Fred Avera's space

------- Original Message --------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:12 AM


Oh, I'm allowed to see him any

time I want, especially since she

said, "I know youll be there

everyday". Zack has allowed

him to visit and gave him away

but wants to enforce Full

Custody and "no contact"

only as far as the school is

conserned, but not allowing

me to tell them. (Will not

allow me to call the school).

<--- Right... Like she is my

publisit and attorney like she

was for my daughter...lo lol...

My asssets are not in her

'sweet hands'.............

------- Original Message --------
From: SPC Brian P Shaver's Mom is blessed! :)
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:08 AM


Hon, are you saying that

you are not being allowed

to see your son???

------- Original Message --------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM


Folder One - 20

I know my son was gone for

the weekend with his friends.

Here I was trying to see if Darlene

Roger's went with Bleu to find

what kind of relationship Bleu and

her have. (I am making sure she

is not spending weekends with

him trying to 'bond with him, or

influence him on a serious,

'inappropriate', level.) All

my questions seem to irritate

her but I finally get her to

communicate her dissatisfaction

with the way I treat her.

That Saturday I spoke to

Darlene's mother, June Rogers,

at her home and she told me

Dolly had the day off and was

resting and relaxing and that

it is funny she should say

that 'she was at work',

because she never takes

the dog to work. I also was

told she heard the dog earlier

that morning.

On Monday I find out my

son went to visit a friend

he meet in Pre-school,

Connor. I was told by

Darlene Rogers this family

lived in Salem, the family

that Zachariah Burton

Singleton was angry with for

convincing Bleu 'his dad told

them he could go live with

them'. These are the people

Zachariah put on the Status

Quo as people he intended to

give partial custody to. Zack

had only met them once.

This tells me, Bleu, again is

trying to negotiate his way

out of living with his father, as

he did in the past, congruent

with harsh feelings today, and

that he does not feel he is

settled or satisfied with

Darlene Rogers as a permanent

place to live, which is consistent

with Bleu will have to make

up his mind at the end of the

School year about where he

wants to live. Melanie told

me Bleu is to blame for Zack

and Jenna's divorce and that

all they do is yell at him and

that Jenna does not want him

because he is not her flesh and

blood. That Jenna wants Bleu to

leave.

Bleu was enrolled in school before

I found out he was in Portland.

Temporary Guardianship papers

were signed so Bleu could decide

where he wanted to live. Darlene

Rogers has told me, 'there is

that Court Order in place' and

she will not divert from it at the

School but every where else is

OK to ignore it as long as it

does not come to the attention

of the school. I called the school

pretending to enroll a new student

to see what the reaction would be

when I told them my name. (My

son reported Dolly complained as

she came in the door after work

on the day I contacted the

enrollment department, PTA, etc. ).

I am told by Darlene Rogers not

to contact the school. My son

expresses apprehension and

said, "No body would accept your

contact information even for a

live and death emergency".

('For nearly one year I requested

Darlene Rogers tell me the city

Zack lived in so I could file a

substitute service seeking

visitation with my son'). In spite

the fact, Zack currently has

allowed visitation between Bleu

and I, I am not placed on the

school records as a person to

contact in case of an emergency,

but, it is OK with Darlene Rogers

that I visit him and that I could

begin visits right away even as

early as 9:00 (that same day

because Bleu had the whole day

to spend before he started school)

Darlene is at work - the time she

stated she has a regular

scheduled work day). I have

explained to Darlene Rogers

there was never a case brought

against me regarding the

allegations against my parenting,

and that there was no reasonable

cause to believe child abuse or

neglect occurred, that CPS can

not present a case because the

statute of limitations is up, that

one year has expired and this

matter has not resolved itself

yet, since Judge Horner ordered

to hear from the CPS and they

did not follow a direct court order,

that I do not have to contact that

agency according to my rights to

Due Process when the case is

closed and I am told the agency

is not responding, that Judge

Horner can not 'Adjudicate and

then say he needs to adjudicate

further, on the same matter, is

against my right to not be tried

twice', that I was not given a

friar trial, not given an opportunity

to present evidence, not allowed

to ask questions to my opponent

in court, that the original order to

move Blue to his dad's was in

violation of Supreme Court rule,

[a home can not be made in a

day, (or in seven months or in

three years in this case,) A judge,

like William Horner, is not supposed

to stall in delivering his adjudication

causing another violation when

he signed papers not presented to

him by a moving party, (making him

party to the action) to prepare his

own papers to sign, which

Zachariah Singleton failed to do,

also causing another compromise

at the clerks office for putting

such a document into the mail,

now further, the worst offense I

see, Judge Horner did in violation

of the Separation of Powers,

acting as DA, demanded discovery

after he had delivered a verbal

order, which has caused continual

Arbitrarily Restraint which is currently

my Death Penalty and exacted the

method in which others inflict upon

me 'social death', allowing others

to Terminated my Parental rights,

placing me under social duress to

comply with further violations

against the Oath of Office, (continually

supporting, as current circumstances,

the mute allegation asserted as

cause to bring the Independence

Police Department to Arrest my

daughter and threaten to kick down

my front door because I demanded

CPS show a search warrant from a

real judge. on and on, and on. I

have had no show of support from

Darlene Rogers other that what she

claims as her obedience to what she

is told to do even if she thinks it is

so unjust and against all she would

have for me in her heart.

My son told me, "My dad said I

had a choice of places I could

live". Darlene Rogers confirmed

Zack did say Bleu could come

to live with me and she has not

revealed to me the details

regarding what date someone

contacted her regarding Bleu's

wishes to no longer live with his

dad. I have no information

other than what I hear from my

son and Melanie regarding

this matter.

I have not been included in any

conversations regarding how

she portrays my relationship with

herself when conversing with Bleu's

father. Darlene Rogers has not

explained why she, in spite my

wishes she have no contact with

Bleu, has put herself in as an

alternate option for permanent

placement when I have diligently

(for the last year and more)

explained to her and other people

who announce to her my complaints

and things I say, like; 'she is not

allowed in my home', 'I am very angry

with her for letting a criminal move

in with my daughter while she was in

foster care', 'that if the State

bills me for the money given to her

she will be the person I say should

pay it back since she is in breach

of contract and failed in her duty

to supervise me daughter', 'I will

not be attending holiday activities

in her home anymore so don't invite

me', 'if I had Bleu in my care she

would not be allowed in his life at

all', 'she is not to introduce

me as her daughter to people', 'I

resent the fact she has preserved

her relationship with my son over

mine by not helping me with the

things I ask of her so I may take

care of legal issues'. All these

messages and conversations

transpired prior to end of my and

my son's alienated condition.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends

the message she does not want to

talk to me.



---------Why are my calls bad?



"No I just tried calling you a

minute ago and it failed."



--------- Oh.



"Anyway, what, what is going

on, what do you need?"



--------- Oh, I was just seeing

about the ride to pick up Bleu.



Oh, well, why, that's ten hours

or so, I got to go to work

right now, I gotta' go pick up

the kids from church.



"Well I'm trying to set an

appointment what time...



Later on in the conversation

she yells at me about how I don't

even like her, you have not

called me in years, your not calling

to talk to me, your using my

minutes, all the sudden you call

me twenty times a day, you

must have free minutes on your

phone, Melanie won't let me

baby-sit Victoria, I don't want to

ride with you for two hours and

listen to you. ( my legal

interpretations ). tell me what

to do, ( this would apply

especially now that she has 'control' ) .,

all you do is argue, I don't want to

fight, (pre emptive - I just go on and

on about Impeaching a judge and

that is not what she wants

to talk about and has stated "That

is not what Bleu wants", ).

[I know that is not what his dad

wants and for Darlene Rogers

to have Zack as a friend she is

going to have to say, 'All hail

to Horner's demand to try Marilyn

LeBaron twice]. but she is

not my son's lawyer when she is a

direct opponent also contending for

his permanency decision.and certainly

she should not be a witness if she

stands to directly gain from

her testimony.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends

the message she does

not want to talk to me.

Folder 0ne - 1



[Phony Cheerfulness with stress

in her voice all over the place].

She is letting me know she does

not have time to talk to me.



Darlene Rogers.. Hello?



­­­­­­­­­­­---------Hey, What is going

on? It's Marilyn.



Darlene Rogers.. Ah, I, Yeah!



---------Yeah!



Darlene Rogers.. Chuckle.

You called early; I was getting in

the shower.. Giggle ... Oh! "Hello?"



---------Yeah!


---------Well, I mean I, was

right there on the couch

yesterday when you called

Melanie to tell her you

had Bleu.



Darlene Rogers.. "Yes!", "Yeah".



"That's what, yeah, I called.

I-I told her, I told her, I said,

"Well", yah, cause I, that way

I know she could pass that

on to you while I was on my

way to work, cause I, she was

just, I was just pulling up into

the driveway.

"Yeah!"

and told her to pass that on".


----- Original Message -----

From: eBLAWg
To: robin.mimms@state.or.us
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of

Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman


Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner

...'theft' from an elderly woman

Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...

Please help me but I demand you

keep this out of the hands of the CPS...

(Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict

of interest for them, who are being

sued by millions all over this nation,

to handle my allegation against them!

-(family law judges acting as god

over Best Interests and ignoring every

good standard of law at the whim of

a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish

to uphold my right to incommunicado

form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

This matter should be treated as

a matter for the Justice System and

kept out of Family Court. I demand

my son be left alone and you people

rely on my tape recording of his free

and relaxed statements while under

my questioning! My son, as well as

my daughter and I are potential

witness against Darlene Rogers if it

is proved she ''miss managed money

entrusted to her'' by an elderly

woman who embraced her as 'family', like

we, the LeBaron family, were honored

in the Roger's home for many years.

I have instructed my son to say, if

ever questioned by the CPS, to say,

"You are not my counsel of choice".

I do not allow any contact with my son

at his school especially by a CPS

worker and I do not authorize any

psychological evaluations to be ordered

by any State Agency or Child Protection

Worker. This because of the Witherspoon

case in California, which established as a

president the one clinical evaluation can

overturn three judges who all said Julie

should get her kids back.

My son is being used as a messenger

to show Darlene Roger's has more

influence than me over the

interpretations surrounding her

method of restitution for moneys she

claimed where taken by her mother

without her knowing from a bank

account in both their names. (This

is what Bleu told me). June Rogers

said she knows nothing of this and

I agreed with her when she said she

would never speak out against her

daughter. I infer: (for her to put all

the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH

WARRANT was gotten it would have

to be proved Darlene Roger's never

opened a bank statement and all the

checks or withdrawals would have to

be signed in her mother's hand except

the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed

she took out herself full knowing the

money's were almost depleted. She

usually puts notes on her papers,

checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know

she does balance her bank statements

as she normally does but I don't know

what account she deposited the money

in. Bleu said she had a new bank and

that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was

to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my

son if he knew about the money,

which Dolly said she spent, which

belonged to Pearl, a long time friend

of the Roger's women, June and her

daughter, two women I considered

to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son

has replied with what Darlene Roger's

has prompted him to say if he is ever

asked questions which is evidence there

is a breach of trust between her and I,

since she knows I am very angry with

her and deliberately interfering with my

son's return to me to keep us both in her

nest. She snapping at me while in the

middle of raising her voice to me, and

confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I

know you will be here everyday". She

also said she knows I am not calling her

to see her, which is a 'no brainer'

because she has me and my son under

her control and I have avidly expressed my

discontentment with her without relenting

for over a year now.

I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This

will stay in the 'family', along with all the

other arguments" while scolding me,

"Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!",

blaming that on me... then later moving

to control me and my contact with her

while visiting my son which resulted in an

ultimatum and a direct order that I do

not contradict her in front of 'my' son,

and other petty things, after I asked

her not to degrade me in front of him

at our visits.

I am afraid of this woman and have

been for quite some time now feeling

like I am held hostage by her only

praying to find a shred of evidence

some where of how to contact my

son's and his father.

Zack being adamant about not having

anything to do with me, him and his

wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads

of mail", according to my son who asked

me if I had ever threatened them. My

ILSUP has got me into trouble here

(I think) because Bleu mentioned the

pictures I drew, which his father showed

him intending to complain about my poor

judgment in mailing them to him. This is

in evidence because Zack mailed those

drawings to Judge Horner trying to

make trouble for me. I am not a detective

but insist on getting a reaction out of

people and try to document what caused

them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on

what they report as cause, (reflecting on

my probable cause rights) this to show

they focus on all the stuff that came up

after the fact of my prayers and praise

to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please

see the State of Oregon protection

of bureaucrat confused as cause after

the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated,

DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially

consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge

Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL

EXPLANATION).

My ILSUP should not be a factor here since

it never wound up in the discovery, which

is true even in the Court Record and what

Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER

OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was

trying to get physical proof of what motivated

my opponents on the matters pertaining

to my children. Instead of justice I got

diagnosed with a new mental disease

though never in receipt of and invitation

to 'family unity meetings' or offered a

reunification plan for either my children.

Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution

of the United States on these matters

while keeping to the State constitution

that a bureaucrat is not supposed to

have a special position which is the

equivalent of all having the right to

equal protection. in so. None of this

is to be read by Michael D Shrunk.

I reject his leadership and declare

him to be my families political enemy

because he would allow us to be

menaced with the threat of the equivalent

of the Death Penalty and deny us due

process of law while a threat is

leveraged by his constituent which causes

him to send the message, "I can prosecute

you if you don't want to be named a victim",

& "My constituents will make sure to make

your daughter one if you don't let me

represent you".

Please bear in mind all your hands as

policemen or women are just as dirty as

Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to

kicking in people's doors without a proper

search warrant based of probable case

because parents are being handed the

equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday

in 'America' -(family law judges acting as

god over Best Interests and ignoring every

good standard of law.)-


You have a copy of this already but it is

relevant.

August 4, 2007

Department of Human Services
Child Protective Services
177 SW Oak St
Dallas, Oregon 97338


Dear Disclosure Officer,

Pursuant to the state open records law, Or. Rev. Stat. sec. 192.410 to

192.524, I write to request access to and a copy of any facts regarding

the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron,

Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to

Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant

to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include

all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS

records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are

date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding

possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January

10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR

 definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation

of Medical Neglect. If your agency does not maintain these public records,

please let me know who does and include the proper custodian's name

and address.

I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more

than $.60 cents, as not to cause undue delay and for that reason only.

If the cost would be greater than this amount, please notify me. Please

provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document·

As provided by the open records law, I would request your response

within seven (7) days.

If you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation

for the denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s)

 upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of

otherwise exempt material.


Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy

necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that

willful violation of the open records law can result in the award of litigation

costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney fees.

Thank you for your assistance.


Sincerely,



UCC 1-308, Thomas AB LeBaron, and Marilyn LeBaron, Power of Attorney

in Fact, in Propria Persona by Special Visitation

portland, oregon [97233]

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage

if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor

I wish any contact with your agency, period, for any reason.

DHS IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO BE OUR COUNSEL OF CHOICE. YOU ARE FIRED.

(503) 262-6723

----------------------------------

Any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS

records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are

date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other

finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for

the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.

----------------------------------

any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,

with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my

door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable

Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Melanie

LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there

was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO

DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.

My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding

harm or eminent threat.

----------------------------------

any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,

with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door

on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause'

logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander

Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show

there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO

DETERMINE for the 7 January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.

My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding

harm or eminent threat with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect.

----------------------------------

any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,

with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on

November 21, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or

releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only,

pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to

February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the

disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major

Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm',

conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety

threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner

presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case

assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to

uphold the Sixth Amendment right to PRESENTMENT, in numerous

letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid

April of 2005, directly pertaining to CPS activity toward protecting

my son from any damages adjacent to the allegation of medical

neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff

members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any.

Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or

notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to

Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005,

to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of

UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety

Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm',

conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize

safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect

on two counts

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner

presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case

assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to

uphold the Sixth Amendment, our inalienable right to PRESENTMENT,

entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn

LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS

activity presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my

son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect.

Please include any documented comments from any staff members,

or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include

any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included

as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron,

and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any

letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized

and mandated to cross report if said correspondence could be

construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that

which is directed from DHS staff toward the numerous letters

mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351.

My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions

and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety

threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two

counts

----------------------------------

Please include any documented comments from any staff

members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if

any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those

comments or notes included as Exhibits as 'Expert Testimony'

and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to

February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence

by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to

cross report if said correspondence which could be construed

as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is

directed from DHS staff toward numerous letters mailed to

DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My

request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and

circumstances', 'ability to manage' or 'recognize' 'safety threats'

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &

05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, PCC C, Horner presiding, with

relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the date November 21,

2005. Please include all invitations extended to DHS staff to

uphold the Sixth Amendment, or PRESENTMENT, entered in

numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron

prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS

activity in and attempt to gain an opportunity for a rebuttal

of allegations presented to Zachariah B. Singleton on February

08, 2005 and presented as protective or remedial toward

protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation

of medical neglect.

----------------------------------


any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064

& 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court,

Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and

the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant

to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005.

Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for

access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only,

pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped

prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other

finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE

for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.

My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding

'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of

Medical Neglect on two counts


----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064

& 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court,

Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III,

which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but adjacent

to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police

Department, on November 18, 2005. Please include Exhibits of

'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS

records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron,

which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show

cause Supervisory Staff had good cause to say, there would

have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term'

'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions

'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', and 'ability to manage or

recognize safety threats', with respect to the allegation of

Medical Neglect

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for

Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED

case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat',

with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah

Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the

case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is

directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the

Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005. Please

include any demands for access to any information thereto

logged in DHS records, and DHS records only prior to April 2005

and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are

relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06,

2005

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for

Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED

case", in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat',

with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah

Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the

case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is

directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the

Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005

----------------------------------

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and

postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither

my children nor I wish to be contacted CPS Agents, period, for

any reason.

Please include any demands for access to any information thereto

logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, prior to April 2005

and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant

to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005.

----------------------------------

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Kristin, an 'Edwards Democrat'
Date: Apr 12, 2008 8:59 PM


I can do. I was trying to read your myspace but my laptop

won't cooperate. If you have a lot of stuff on your myspace,

my computers eats it lol ;)

What is your son's name? I imagine you have a cause on your

page. What it is? Also, when I repost this in bulletin or blog or

both.... I will credit your myspace page! :)

Thanks!
Kristin

---

Subject: RE: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:12:05 -0700
From: Charlene.Barber@state.or.us
To: e-for-mation@hotmail.com

Why did I get this?????

And who are you????

Charlene Barber 

DPSST

Executive Assistant

503-378-2043

charlene.barber@state.or.us

 

---

From: eBLAWg [mailto:e-for-mation@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:21 AM
To: BARBER Charlene
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from

an elderly woman

 Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...  

Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands

of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest

for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to

handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as

god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of

law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold

my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

12:03 AM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment -