|
------- Original Message --------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:12 AM
Oh, I'm allowed to see him any
time I want, especially since she
said, "I know youll be there
everyday". Zack has allowed
him to visit and gave him away
but wants to enforce Full
Custody and "no contact"
only as far as the school is
conserned, but not allowing
me to tell them. (Will not
allow me to call the school).
<--- Right... Like she is my
publisit and attorney like she
was for my daughter...lo lol...
My asssets are not in her
'sweet hands'.............
------- Original Message --------
From: SPC Brian P Shaver's Mom is blessed! :)
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:08 AM
Hon, are you saying that
you are not being allowed
to see your son???
------- Original Message --------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM
Folder One - 20
I know my son was gone for
the weekend with his friends.
Here I was trying to see if Darlene
Roger's went with Bleu to find
what kind of relationship Bleu and
her have. (I am making sure she
is not spending weekends with
him trying to 'bond with him, or
influence him on a serious,
'inappropriate', level.) All
my questions seem to irritate
her but I finally get her to
communicate her dissatisfaction
with the way I treat her.
That Saturday I spoke to
Darlene's mother, June Rogers,
at her home and she told me
Dolly had the day off and was
resting and relaxing and that
it is funny she should say
that 'she was at work',
because she never takes
the dog to work. I also was
told she heard the dog earlier
that morning.
On Monday I find out my
son went to visit a friend
he meet in Pre-school,
Connor. I was told by
Darlene Rogers this family
lived in Salem, the family
that Zachariah Burton
Singleton was angry with for
convincing Bleu 'his dad told
them he could go live with
them'. These are the people
Zachariah put on the Status
Quo as people he intended to
give partial custody to. Zack
had only met them once.
This tells me, Bleu, again is
trying to negotiate his way
out of living with his father, as
he did in the past, congruent
with harsh feelings today, and
that he does not feel he is
settled or satisfied with
Darlene Rogers as a permanent
place to live, which is consistent
with Bleu will have to make
up his mind at the end of the
School year about where he
wants to live. Melanie told
me Bleu is to blame for Zack
and Jenna's divorce and that
all they do is yell at him and
that Jenna does not want him
because he is not her flesh and
blood. That Jenna wants Bleu to
leave.
Bleu was enrolled in school before
I found out he was in Portland.
Temporary Guardianship papers
were signed so Bleu could decide
where he wanted to live. Darlene
Rogers has told me, 'there is
that Court Order in place' and
she will not divert from it at the
School but every where else is
OK to ignore it as long as it
does not come to the attention
of the school. I called the school
pretending to enroll a new student
to see what the reaction would be
when I told them my name. (My
son reported Dolly complained as
she came in the door after work
on the day I contacted the
enrollment department, PTA, etc. ).
I am told by Darlene Rogers not
to contact the school. My son
expresses apprehension and
said, "No body would accept your
contact information even for a
live and death emergency".
('For nearly one year I requested
Darlene Rogers tell me the city
Zack lived in so I could file a
substitute service seeking
visitation with my son'). In spite
the fact, Zack currently has
allowed visitation between Bleu
and I, I am not placed on the
school records as a person to
contact in case of an emergency,
but, it is OK with Darlene Rogers
that I visit him and that I could
begin visits right away even as
early as 9:00 (that same day
because Bleu had the whole day
to spend before he started school)
Darlene is at work - the time she
stated she has a regular
scheduled work day). I have
explained to Darlene Rogers
there was never a case brought
against me regarding the
allegations against my parenting,
and that there was no reasonable
cause to believe child abuse or
neglect occurred, that CPS can
not present a case because the
statute of limitations is up, that
one year has expired and this
matter has not resolved itself
yet, since Judge Horner ordered
to hear from the CPS and they
did not follow a direct court order,
that I do not have to contact that
agency according to my rights to
Due Process when the case is
closed and I am told the agency
is not responding, that Judge
Horner can not 'Adjudicate and
then say he needs to adjudicate
further, on the same matter, is
against my right to not be tried
twice', that I was not given a
friar trial, not given an opportunity
to present evidence, not allowed
to ask questions to my opponent
in court, that the original order to
move Blue to his dad's was in
violation of Supreme Court rule,
[a home can not be made in a
day, (or in seven months or in
three years in this case,) A judge,
like William Horner, is not supposed
to stall in delivering his adjudication
causing another violation when
he signed papers not presented to
him by a moving party, (making him
party to the action) to prepare his
own papers to sign, which
Zachariah Singleton failed to do,
also causing another compromise
at the clerks office for putting
such a document into the mail,
now further, the worst offense I
see, Judge Horner did in violation
of the Separation of Powers,
acting as DA, demanded discovery
after he had delivered a verbal
order, which has caused continual
Arbitrarily Restraint which is currently
my Death Penalty and exacted the
method in which others inflict upon
me 'social death', allowing others
to Terminated my Parental rights,
placing me under social duress to
comply with further violations
against the Oath of Office, (continually
supporting, as current circumstances,
the mute allegation asserted as
cause to bring the Independence
Police Department to Arrest my
daughter and threaten to kick down
my front door because I demanded
CPS show a search warrant from a
real judge. on and on, and on. I
have had no show of support from
Darlene Rogers other that what she
claims as her obedience to what she
is told to do even if she thinks it is
so unjust and against all she would
have for me in her heart.
My son told me, "My dad said I
had a choice of places I could
live". Darlene Rogers confirmed
Zack did say Bleu could come
to live with me and she has not
revealed to me the details
regarding what date someone
contacted her regarding Bleu's
wishes to no longer live with his
dad. I have no information
other than what I hear from my
son and Melanie regarding
this matter.
I have not been included in any
conversations regarding how
she portrays my relationship with
herself when conversing with Bleu's
father. Darlene Rogers has not
explained why she, in spite my
wishes she have no contact with
Bleu, has put herself in as an
alternate option for permanent
placement when I have diligently
(for the last year and more)
explained to her and other people
who announce to her my complaints
and things I say, like; 'she is not
allowed in my home', 'I am very angry
with her for letting a criminal move
in with my daughter while she was in
foster care', 'that if the State
bills me for the money given to her
she will be the person I say should
pay it back since she is in breach
of contract and failed in her duty
to supervise me daughter', 'I will
not be attending holiday activities
in her home anymore so don't invite
me', 'if I had Bleu in my care she
would not be allowed in his life at
all', 'she is not to introduce
me as her daughter to people', 'I
resent the fact she has preserved
her relationship with my son over
mine by not helping me with the
things I ask of her so I may take
care of legal issues'. All these
messages and conversations
transpired prior to end of my and
my son's alienated condition.
Darlene Roger's constantly sends
the message she does not want to
talk to me.
---------Why are my calls bad?
"No I just tried calling you a
minute ago and it failed."
--------- Oh.
"Anyway, what, what is going
on, what do you need?"
--------- Oh, I was just seeing
about the ride to pick up Bleu.
Oh, well, why, that's ten hours
or so, I got to go to work
right now, I gotta' go pick up
the kids from church.
"Well I'm trying to set an
appointment what time...
Later on in the conversation
she yells at me about how I don't
even like her, you have not
called me in years, your not calling
to talk to me, your using my
minutes, all the sudden you call
me twenty times a day, you
must have free minutes on your
phone, Melanie won't let me
baby-sit Victoria, I don't want to
ride with you for two hours and
listen to you. ( my legal
interpretations ). tell me what
to do, ( this would apply
especially now that she has 'control' ) .,
all you do is argue, I don't want to
fight, (pre emptive - I just go on and
on about Impeaching a judge and
that is not what she wants
to talk about and has stated "That
is not what Bleu wants", ).
[I know that is not what his dad
wants and for Darlene Rogers
to have Zack as a friend she is
going to have to say, 'All hail
to Horner's demand to try Marilyn
LeBaron twice]. but she is
not my son's lawyer when she is a
direct opponent also contending for
his permanency decision.and certainly
she should not be a witness if she
stands to directly gain from
her testimony.
Darlene Roger's constantly sends
the message she does
not want to talk to me.
Folder 0ne - 1
[Phony Cheerfulness with stress
in her voice all over the place].
She is letting me know she does
not have time to talk to me.
Darlene Rogers.. Hello?
---------Hey, What is going
on? It's Marilyn.
Darlene Rogers.. Ah, I, Yeah!
---------Yeah!
Darlene Rogers.. Chuckle.
You called early; I was getting in
the shower.. Giggle ... Oh! "Hello?"
---------Yeah!
---------Well, I mean I, was
right there on the couch
yesterday when you called
Melanie to tell her you
had Bleu.
Darlene Rogers.. "Yes!", "Yeah".
"That's what, yeah, I called.
I-I told her, I told her, I said,
"Well", yah, cause I, that way
I know she could pass that
on to you while I was on my
way to work, cause I, she was
just, I was just pulling up into
the driveway.
"Yeah!"
and told her to pass that on".
----- Original Message -----
From: eBLAWg
To: robin.mimms@state.or.us
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of
Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner
...'theft' from an elderly woman
Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...
Please help me but I demand you
keep this out of the hands of the CPS...
(Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict
of interest for them, who are being
sued by millions all over this nation,
to handle my allegation against them!
-(family law judges acting as god
over Best Interests and ignoring every
good standard of law at the whim of
a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish
to uphold my right to incommunicado
form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.
This matter should be treated as
a matter for the Justice System and
kept out of Family Court. I demand
my son be left alone and you people
rely on my tape recording of his free
and relaxed statements while under
my questioning! My son, as well as
my daughter and I are potential
witness against Darlene Rogers if it
is proved she ''miss managed money
entrusted to her'' by an elderly
woman who embraced her as 'family', like
we, the LeBaron family, were honored
in the Roger's home for many years.
I have instructed my son to say, if
ever questioned by the CPS, to say,
"You are not my counsel of choice".
I do not allow any contact with my son
at his school especially by a CPS
worker and I do not authorize any
psychological evaluations to be ordered
by any State Agency or Child Protection
Worker. This because of the Witherspoon
case in California, which established as a
president the one clinical evaluation can
overturn three judges who all said Julie
should get her kids back.
My son is being used as a messenger
to show Darlene Roger's has more
influence than me over the
interpretations surrounding her
method of restitution for moneys she
claimed where taken by her mother
without her knowing from a bank
account in both their names. (This
is what Bleu told me). June Rogers
said she knows nothing of this and
I agreed with her when she said she
would never speak out against her
daughter. I infer: (for her to put all
the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH
WARRANT was gotten it would have
to be proved Darlene Roger's never
opened a bank statement and all the
checks or withdrawals would have to
be signed in her mother's hand except
the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed
she took out herself full knowing the
money's were almost depleted. She
usually puts notes on her papers,
checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know
she does balance her bank statements
as she normally does but I don't know
what account she deposited the money
in. Bleu said she had a new bank and
that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was
to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my
son if he knew about the money,
which Dolly said she spent, which
belonged to Pearl, a long time friend
of the Roger's women, June and her
daughter, two women I considered
to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son
has replied with what Darlene Roger's
has prompted him to say if he is ever
asked questions which is evidence there
is a breach of trust between her and I,
since she knows I am very angry with
her and deliberately interfering with my
son's return to me to keep us both in her
nest. She snapping at me while in the
middle of raising her voice to me, and
confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I
know you will be here everyday". She
also said she knows I am not calling her
to see her, which is a 'no brainer'
because she has me and my son under
her control and I have avidly expressed my
discontentment with her without relenting
for over a year now.
I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This
will stay in the 'family', along with all the
other arguments" while scolding me,
"Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!",
blaming that on me... then later moving
to control me and my contact with her
while visiting my son which resulted in an
ultimatum and a direct order that I do
not contradict her in front of 'my' son,
and other petty things, after I asked
her not to degrade me in front of him
at our visits.
I am afraid of this woman and have
been for quite some time now feeling
like I am held hostage by her only
praying to find a shred of evidence
some where of how to contact my
son's and his father.
Zack being adamant about not having
anything to do with me, him and his
wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads
of mail", according to my son who asked
me if I had ever threatened them. My
ILSUP has got me into trouble here
(I think) because Bleu mentioned the
pictures I drew, which his father showed
him intending to complain about my poor
judgment in mailing them to him. This is
in evidence because Zack mailed those
drawings to Judge Horner trying to
make trouble for me. I am not a detective
but insist on getting a reaction out of
people and try to document what caused
them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on
what they report as cause, (reflecting on
my probable cause rights) this to show
they focus on all the stuff that came up
after the fact of my prayers and praise
to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please
see the State of Oregon protection
of bureaucrat confused as cause after
the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated,
DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially
consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge
Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL
EXPLANATION).
My ILSUP should not be a factor here since
it never wound up in the discovery, which
is true even in the Court Record and what
Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER
OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was
trying to get physical proof of what motivated
my opponents on the matters pertaining
to my children. Instead of justice I got
diagnosed with a new mental disease
though never in receipt of and invitation
to 'family unity meetings' or offered a
reunification plan for either my children.
Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution
of the United States on these matters
while keeping to the State constitution
that a bureaucrat is not supposed to
have a special position which is the
equivalent of all having the right to
equal protection. in so. None of this
is to be read by Michael D Shrunk.
I reject his leadership and declare
him to be my families political enemy
because he would allow us to be
menaced with the threat of the equivalent
of the Death Penalty and deny us due
process of law while a threat is
leveraged by his constituent which causes
him to send the message, "I can prosecute
you if you don't want to be named a victim",
& "My constituents will make sure to make
your daughter one if you don't let me
represent you".
Please bear in mind all your hands as
policemen or women are just as dirty as
Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to
kicking in people's doors without a proper
search warrant based of probable case
because parents are being handed the
equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday
in 'America' -(family law judges acting as
god over Best Interests and ignoring every
good standard of law.)-
You have a copy of this already but it is
relevant.
August 4, 2007
Department of Human Services
Child Protective Services
177 SW Oak St
Dallas, Oregon 97338
Dear Disclosure Officer,
Pursuant to the state open records law, Or. Rev. Stat. sec. 192.410 to
192.524, I write to request access to and a copy of any facts regarding
the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron,
Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to
Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant
to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include
all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS
records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are
date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding
possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January
10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR
definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation
of Medical Neglect. If your agency does not maintain these public records,
please let me know who does and include the proper custodian's name
and address.
I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more
than $.60 cents, as not to cause undue delay and for that reason only.
If the cost would be greater than this amount, please notify me. Please
provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document·
As provided by the open records law, I would request your response
within seven (7) days.
If you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation
for the denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s)
upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of
otherwise exempt material.
Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy
necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that
willful violation of the open records law can result in the award of litigation
costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney fees.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
UCC 1-308, Thomas AB LeBaron, and Marilyn LeBaron, Power of Attorney
in Fact, in Propria Persona by Special Visitation
portland, oregon [97233]
Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage
if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor
I wish any contact with your agency, period, for any reason.
DHS IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO BE OUR COUNSEL OF CHOICE. YOU ARE FIRED.
(503) 262-6723
----------------------------------
Any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS
records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are
date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other
finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for
the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.
----------------------------------
any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,
with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my
door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable
Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Melanie
LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there
was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO
DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.
My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding
harm or eminent threat.
----------------------------------
any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,
with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door
on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause'
logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander
Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show
there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO
DETERMINE for the 7 January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.
My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding
harm or eminent threat with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect.
----------------------------------
any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding,
with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on
November 21, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or
releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only,
pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to
February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the
disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major
Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm',
conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety
threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner
presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case
assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to
uphold the Sixth Amendment right to PRESENTMENT, in numerous
letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid
April of 2005, directly pertaining to CPS activity toward protecting
my son from any damages adjacent to the allegation of medical
neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff
members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any.
Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or
notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to
Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005,
to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of
UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety
Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm',
conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize
safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect
on two counts
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner
presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case
assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to
uphold the Sixth Amendment, our inalienable right to PRESENTMENT,
entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn
LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS
activity presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my
son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect.
Please include any documented comments from any staff members,
or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include
any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included
as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron,
and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any
letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized
and mandated to cross report if said correspondence could be
construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that
which is directed from DHS staff toward the numerous letters
mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351.
My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions
and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety
threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two
counts
----------------------------------
Please include any documented comments from any staff
members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if
any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those
comments or notes included as Exhibits as 'Expert Testimony'
and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to
February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence
by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to
cross report if said correspondence which could be construed
as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is
directed from DHS staff toward numerous letters mailed to
DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My
request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and
circumstances', 'ability to manage' or 'recognize' 'safety threats'
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 &
05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, PCC C, Horner presiding, with
relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the date November 21,
2005. Please include all invitations extended to DHS staff to
uphold the Sixth Amendment, or PRESENTMENT, entered in
numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron
prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS
activity in and attempt to gain an opportunity for a rebuttal
of allegations presented to Zachariah B. Singleton on February
08, 2005 and presented as protective or remedial toward
protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation
of medical neglect.
----------------------------------
any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064
& 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court,
Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and
the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant
to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005.
Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for
access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only,
pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped
prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other
finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE
for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.
My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding
'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of
Medical Neglect on two counts
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064
& 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court,
Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III,
which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but adjacent
to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police
Department, on November 18, 2005. Please include Exhibits of
'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS
records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron,
which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show
cause Supervisory Staff had good cause to say, there would
have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term'
'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions
'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', and 'ability to manage or
recognize safety threats', with respect to the allegation of
Medical Neglect
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for
Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED
case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat',
with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah
Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the
case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is
directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the
Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005. Please
include any demands for access to any information thereto
logged in DHS records, and DHS records only prior to April 2005
and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are
relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06,
2005
----------------------------------
all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for
Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED
case", in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat',
with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah
Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the
case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is
directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the
Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005
----------------------------------
Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and
postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither
my children nor I wish to be contacted CPS Agents, period, for
any reason.
Please include any demands for access to any information thereto
logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, prior to April 2005
and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant
to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005.
----------------------------------
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Kristin, an 'Edwards Democrat'
Date: Apr 12, 2008 8:59 PM
I can do. I was trying to read your myspace but my laptop
won't cooperate. If you have a lot of stuff on your myspace,
my computers eats it lol ;)
What is your son's name? I imagine you have a cause on your
page. What it is? Also, when I repost this in bulletin or blog or
both.... I will credit your myspace page! :)
Thanks!
Kristin
Subject: RE: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:12:05 -0700
From: Charlene.Barber@state.or.us
To: e-for-mation@hotmail.com
Why did I get this?????
And who are you????
From: eBLAWg [mailto:e-for-mation@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:21 AM
To: BARBER Charlene
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from
an elderly woman
Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...
Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands
of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest
for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to
handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as
god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of
law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold
my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.
12:03 AM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment -  | 
Tools 
